commit 11c7aa0d upstream.

Commit 545fbd07 ("rq-qos: fix missed wake-ups in rq_qos_throttle")
tried to fix a problem that a process could be sleeping in rq_qos_wait()
without anyone to wake it up. However the fix is not complete and the
following can still happen:

CPU1 (waiter1)		CPU2 (waiter2)		CPU3 (waker)
rq_qos_wait()		rq_qos_wait()
  acquire_inflight_cb() -> fails
			  acquire_inflight_cb() -> fails

						completes IOs, inflight
						  decreased
  prepare_to_wait_exclusive()
			  prepare_to_wait_exclusive()
  has_sleeper = !wq_has_single_sleeper() -> true as there are two sleepers
			  has_sleeper = !wq_has_single_sleeper() -> true
  io_schedule()		  io_schedule()

Deadlock as now there's nobody to wakeup the two waiters. The logic
automatically blocking when there are already sleepers is really subtle
and the only way to make it work reliably is that we check whether there
are some waiters in the queue when adding ourselves there. That way, we
are guaranteed that at least the first process to enter the wait queue
will recheck the waiting condition before going to sleep and thus
guarantee forward progress.

Fixes: 545fbd07 ("rq-qos: fix missed wake-ups in rq_qos_throttle")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210607112613.25344-1-jack@suse.cz


Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts commit 826f2f48.

Qian Cai reports that this commit causes stalls with swap. Revert until
the reason can be figured out.

Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

It is no need do finish_wait twice after acquiring inflight.

Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

scale_up wakes up waiters after scaling up. But after scaling max, it
should not wake up more waiters as waiters will not have anything to
do. This patch fixes this by making scale_up (and also scale_down)
return when threshold is reached.

This bug causes increased fdatasync latency when fdatasync and dd
conv=sync are performed in parallel on 4.19 compared to 4.14. This
bug was introduced during refactoring of blk-wbt code.

Fixes: a7905043 ("blk-rq-qos: refactor out common elements of blk-wbt")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

wbt already gets queue depth changed notification through
wbt_set_queue_depth().  Generalize it into
rq_qos_ops->queue_depth_changed() so that other rq_qos policies can
easily hook into the events too.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Add a merge hook for rq_qos.  This will be used by io.weight.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Oleg noticed that our checking of data.got_token is unsafe in the
cleanup case, and should really use a memory barrier.  Use a wmb on the
write side, and a rmb() on the read side.  We don't need one in the main
loop since we're saved by set_current_state().

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

In case we get a spurious wakeup we need to make sure to re-set
ourselves to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE so we don't busy wait.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If we raced with somebody else getting an inflight counter we could fail
to get an inflight counter with no sleepers on the list, and thus need
to go to sleep.  In this case has_sleepers should be true because we are
now relying on the waker to get our inflight counter for us.  And in the
case of spurious wakeups we'd still want this to be the case.  So set
has_sleepers to true if we went to sleep to make sure we're woken up the
proper way.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We saw a hang in production with WBT where there was only one waiter in
the throttle path and no outstanding IO.  This is because of the
has_sleepers optimization that is used to make sure we don't steal an
inflight counter for new submitters when there are people already on the
list.

We can race with our check to see if the waitqueue has any waiters (this
is done locklessly) and the time we actually add ourselves to the
waitqueue.  If this happens we'll go to sleep and never be woken up
because nobody is doing IO to wake us up.

Fix this by checking if the waitqueue has a single sleeper on the list
after we add ourselves, that way we have an uptodate view of the list.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Add documentation for the @rqw argument and change " - " into ": ".

Fixes: 84f60324 ("block: add rq_qos_wait to rq_qos") # v5.0-rc1~52^2~140.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chiatanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Various block layer files do not have any licensing information at all.
Add SPDX tags for the default kernel GPLv2 license to those.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

blk-mq-debugfs has been proved as very helpful for debug some
tough issues, such as IO hang.

We have seen blk-wbt related IO hang several times, even inside
Red Hat BZ, there is such report not sovled yet, so this patch
adds support debugfs on rq_qos.

Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Originally when I split out the common code from blk-wbt into rq_qos I
left the wbt_wait() where it was and simply copied and modified it
slightly to work for io-latency.  However they are both basically the
same thing, and as time has gone on wbt_wait() has ended up much smarter
and kinder than it was when I copied it into io-latency, which means
io-latency has lost out on these improvements.

Since they are the same thing essentially except for a few minor things,
create rq_qos_wait() that replicates what wbt_wait() currently does with
callbacks that can be passed in for the snowflakes to do their own thing
as appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Put the short code in the fast path, where we don't have any
functions attached to the queue. This minimizes the impact on
the hot path in the core code.

Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Unused now that the legacy request path is gone.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

With the change to use UINT_MAX I broke the depth check as any value of
inflight (ie 0) would be less than (int)UINT_MAX.  Fix this by changing
everything to unsigned int to match the depth.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

wbt cares only about request completion time, but controllers may need
information that is on the bio itself, so add a done_bio callback for
rq-qos so things like blk-iolatency can use it to have the bio when it
completes.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We don't really need to save this stuff in the core block code, we can
just pass the bio back into the helpers later on to derive the same
flags and update the rq->wbt_flags appropriately.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

blkcg-qos is going to do essentially what wbt does, only on a cgroup
basis.  Break out the common code that will be shared between blkcg-qos
and wbt into blk-rq-qos.* so they can both utilize the same
infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>