- May 16, 2023
-
-
Kees Cook authored
The use of -fsanitize=bounds on GCC will ignore some trailing arrays, leaving a gap in coverage. Switch to using -fsanitize=bounds-strict to match Clang's stricter behavior. Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405022356.gonna.338-kees@kernel.org
-
- Jan 20, 2022
-
-
Kees Cook authored
The object-size sanitizer is redundant to -Warray-bounds, and inappropriately performs its checks at run-time when all information needed for the evaluation is available at compile-time, making it quite difficult to use: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214861 With -Warray-bounds almost enabled globally, it doesn't make sense to keep this around. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211203235346.110809-1-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Feb 26, 2021
-
-
Andrey Ryabinin authored
Since GCC 8.0 -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow doesn't work with -fwrapv. -fwrapv makes signed overflows defines and GCC essentially disables ubsan checks. On GCC < 8.0 -fwrapv doesn't have influence on -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow setting, so it kinda works but generates false-positves and violates uaccess rules: lib/iov_iter.o: warning: objtool: iovec_from_user()+0x22d: call to __ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enabled Disable signed overflow checks to avoid these problems. Remove unsigned overflow checks as well. Unsigned overflow appeared as side effect of commit cdf8a76f ("ubsan: move cc-option tests into Kconfig"), but it never worked (kernel doesn't boot). And unsigned overflows are allowed by C standard, so it just pointless. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210209232348.20510-1-ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Dec 16, 2020
-
-
Kees Cook authored
Instead of doing if/endif blocks with cc-option calls in the UBSAN Makefile, move all the tests into Kconfig and use the Makefile to collect the results. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203004437.389959-3-keescook@chromium.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjPasyJrDuwDnpHJS2TuQfExwe=px-SzLeN8GFMAQJPmQ@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Suggested-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by:
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by:
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: George Popescu <georgepope@android.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Kees Cook authored
Patch series "Clean up UBSAN Makefile", v2. This series attempts to address the issues seen with UBSAN's object-size sanitizer causing problems under GCC. In the process, the Kconfig and Makefile are refactored to do all the cc-option calls in the Kconfig. Additionally start to detangle -Wno-maybe-uninitialized, disable UBSAN_TRAP under COMPILE_TEST for wider build coverage, and expand the libusan tests. This patch (of 7): In commit 78a5255f ("Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initialized") -Wmaybe-uninitialized was disabled globally, so keeping the disabling logic here too doesn't make sense. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203004437.389959-1-keescook@chromium.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203004437.389959-2-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: George Popescu <georgepope@android.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Oct 16, 2020
-
-
George Popescu authored
When the kernel is compiled with Clang, -fsanitize=bounds expands to -fsanitize=array-bounds and -fsanitize=local-bounds. Enabling -fsanitize=local-bounds with Clang has the unfortunate side-effect of inserting traps; this goes back to its original intent, which was as a hardening and not a debugging feature [1]. The same feature made its way into -fsanitize=bounds, but the traps remained. For that reason, -fsanitize=bounds was split into 'array-bounds' and 'local-bounds' [2]. Since 'local-bounds' doesn't behave like a normal sanitizer, enable it with Clang only if trapping behaviour was requested by CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y. Add the UBSAN_BOUNDS_LOCAL config to Kconfig.ubsan to enable the 'local-bounds' option by default when UBSAN_TRAP is enabled. [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2012-May/049972.html [2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091536.html Suggested-by:
Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by:
George Popescu <georgepope@android.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by:
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> Reviewed-by:
Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922074330.2549523-1-georgepope@google.com Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Sep 24, 2020
-
-
Masahiro Yamada authored
Move CFLAGS_KASAN*, CFLAGS_UBSAN, CFLAGS_KCSAN to Makefile.kasan, Makefile.ubsan, Makefile.kcsan, respectively. This commit also avoids the same -fsanitize=* flags being added to CFLAGS_UBSAN multiple times. Prior to this commit, the ubsan flags were appended by the '+=' operator, without any initialization. Some build targets such as 'make bindeb-pkg' recurses to the top Makefile, and ended up with adding the same flags to CFLAGS_UBSAN twice. Clear CFLAGS_UBSAN with ':=' to make it a simply expanded variable. This is better than a recursively expanded variable, which evaluates $(call cc-option, ...) multiple times before Kbuild starts descending to subdirectories. Signed-off-by:
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
-
- Aug 09, 2020
-
-
Masahiro Yamada authored
Currently, the top Makefile includes all of scripts/Makefile.<feature> even if the associated CONFIG option is disabled. Do not include unneeded Makefiles in order to slightly optimize the parse stage. Include $(include-y), and ignore $(include-). Signed-off-by:
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
-
- Apr 07, 2020
-
-
Kees Cook authored
In order to do kernel builds with the bounds checker individually available, introduce CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS, with the remaining options under CONFIG_UBSAN_MISC. For example, using this, we can start to expand the coverage syzkaller is providing. Right now, all of UBSan is disabled for syzbot builds because taken as a whole, it is too noisy. This will let us focus on one feature at a time. For the bounds checker specifically, this provides a mechanism to eliminate an entire class of array overflows with close to zero performance overhead (I cannot measure a difference). In my (mostly) defconfig, enabling bounds checking adds ~4200 checks to the kernel. Performance changes are in the noise, likely due to the branch predictors optimizing for the non-fail path. Some notes on the bounds checker: - it does not instrument {mem,str}*()-family functions, it only instruments direct indexed accesses (e.g. "foo[i]"). Dealing with the {mem,str}*()-family functions is a work-in-progress around CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE[1]. - it ignores flexible array members, including the very old single byte (e.g. "int foo[1];") declarations. (Note that GCC's implementation appears to ignore _all_ trailing arrays, but Clang only ignores empty, 0, and 1 byte arrays[2].) [1] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/6 [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92589 Suggested-by:
Elena Petrova <lenaptr@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by:
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227193516.32566-3-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Kees Cook authored
Patch series "ubsan: Split out bounds checker", v5. This splits out the bounds checker so it can be individually used. This is enabled in Android and hopefully for syzbot. Includes LKDTM tests for behavioral corner-cases (beyond just the bounds checker), and adjusts ubsan and kasan slightly for correct panic handling. This patch (of 6): The Undefined Behavior Sanitizer can operate in two modes: warning reporting mode via lib/ubsan.c handler calls, or trap mode, which uses __builtin_trap() as the handler. Using lib/ubsan.c means the kernel image is about 5% larger (due to all the debugging text and reporting structures to capture details about the warning conditions). Using the trap mode, the image size changes are much smaller, though at the loss of the "warning only" mode. In order to give greater flexibility to system builders that want minimal changes to image size and are prepared to deal with kernel code being aborted and potentially destabilizing the system, this introduces CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP. The resulting image sizes comparison: text data bss dec hex filename 19533663 6183037 18554956 44271656 2a38828 vmlinux.stock 19991849 7618513 18874448 46484810 2c54d4a vmlinux.ubsan 19712181 6284181 18366540 44362902 2a4ec96 vmlinux.ubsan-trap CONFIG_UBSAN=y: image +4.8% (text +2.3%, data +18.9%) CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y: image +0.2% (text +0.9%, data +1.6%) Additionally adjusts the CONFIG_UBSAN Kconfig help for clarity and removes the mention of non-existing boot param "ubsan_handle". Suggested-by:
Elena Petrova <lenaptr@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by:
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227193516.32566-2-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- May 06, 2019
-
-
Andrey Ryabinin authored
The kernel the kernel is built with -Wvla for some time, so is not supposed to have any variable length arrays. Remove vla bounds checking from ubsan since it's useless now. Signed-off-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Aug 11, 2018
-
-
Andrey Ryabinin authored
With gcc-8 fsanitize=null become very noisy. GCC started to complain about things like &a->b, where 'a' is NULL pointer. There is no NULL dereference, we just calculate address to struct member. It's technically undefined behavior so UBSAN is correct to report it. But as long as there is no real NULL-dereference, I think, we should be fine. -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks compiler flag should protect us from any consequences. So let's just no use -fsanitize=null as it's not useful for us. If there is a real NULL-deref we will see crash. Even if userspace mapped something at NULL (root can do this), with things like SMAP should catch the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180802153209.813-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Feb 07, 2018
-
-
Andrey Ryabinin authored
Similarly to type mismatch checks, new GCC 8.x and Clang also changed for ABI for returns_nonnull checks. While we can update our code to conform the new ABI it's more reasonable to just remove it. Because it's just dead code, we don't have any single user of returns_nonnull attribute in the whole kernel. And AFAIU the advantage that this attribute could bring would be mitigated by -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks cflag that we use to build the kernel. So it's unlikely we will have a lot of returns_nonnull attribute in future. So let's just remove the code, it has no use. [aryabinin@virtuozzo.com: fix warning] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180122165711.11510-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180119152853.16806-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Nov 02, 2017
-
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard...
-
- Nov 11, 2016
-
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
Traditionally, we have always had warnings about uninitialized variables enabled, as this is part of -Wall, and generally a good idea [1], but it also always produced false positives, mainly because this is a variation of the halting problem and provably impossible to get right in all cases [2]. Various people have identified cases that are particularly bad for false positives, and in commit e74fc973 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os"), I turned off the warning for any build that was done with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE. This drastically reduced the number of false positive warnings in the default build but unfortunately had the side effect of turning the warning off completely in 'allmodconfig' builds, which in turn led to a lot of warnings (both actual bugs, and remaining false positives) to go in unnoticed. With commit 877417e6 ("Kbuild: change CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE definition") enabled the warning again for allmodconfig builds in v4.7 and in v4.8-rc1, I had finally managed to address all warnings I get in an ARM allmodconfig build and most other maybe-uninitialized warnings for ARM randconfig builds. However, commit 6e8d666e ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning globally") was merged at the same time and disabled it completely for all configurations, because of false-positive warnings on x86 that I had not addressed until then. This caused a lot of actual bugs to get merged into mainline, and I sent several dozen patches for these during the v4.9 development cycle. Most of these are actual bugs, some are for correct code that is safe because it is only called under external constraints that make it impossible to run into the case that gcc sees, and in a few cases gcc is just stupid and finds something that can obviously never happen. I have now done a few thousand randconfig builds on x86 and collected all patches that I needed to address every single warning I got (I can provide the combined patch for the other warnings if anyone is interested), so I hope we can get the warning back and let people catch the actual bugs earlier. This reverts the change to disable the warning completely and for now brings it back at the "make W=1" level, so we can get it merged into mainline without introducing false positives. A follow-up patch enables it on all levels unless some configuration option turns it off because of false-positives. Link: https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=232 [1] Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings [2] Signed-off-by:
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Sep 20, 2016
-
-
Christian Borntraeger authored
Some architectures use a hardware defined structure at address zero. Checking for a null pointer will result in many ubsan reports. Allow users to disable the null sanitizer. Signed-off-by:
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by:
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
-
- Jul 27, 2016
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
Several build configurations had already disabled this warning because it generates a lot of false positives. But some had not, and it was still enabled for "allmodconfig" builds, for example. Looking at the warnings produced, every single one I looked at was a false positive, and the warnings are frequent enough (and big enough) that they can easily hide real problems that you don't notice in the noise generated by -Wmaybe-uninitialized. The warning is good in theory, but this is a classic case of a warning that causes more problems than the warning can solve. If gcc gets better at avoiding false positives, we may be able to re-enable this warning. But as is, we're better off without it, and I want to be able to see the *real* warnings. Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Mar 22, 2016
-
-
Andrey Ryabinin authored
-fsanitize=* options makes GCC less smart than usual and increase number of 'maybe-uninitialized' false-positives. So this patch does two things: * Add -Wno-maybe-uninitialized to CFLAGS_UBSAN which will disable all such warnings for instrumented files. * Remove CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL from all[yes|mod]config builds. So the all[yes|mod]config build goes without -fsanitize=* and still with -Wmaybe-uninitialized. Signed-off-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Reported-by:
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- Jan 21, 2016
-
-
Andrey Ryabinin authored
UBSAN uses compile-time instrumentation to catch undefined behavior (UB). Compiler inserts code that perform certain kinds of checks before operations that could cause UB. If check fails (i.e. UB detected) __ubsan_handle_* function called to print error message. So the most of the work is done by compiler. This patch just implements ubsan handlers printing errors. GCC has this capability since 4.9.x [1] (see -fsanitize=undefined option and its suboptions). However GCC 5.x has more checkers implemented [2]. Article [3] has a bit more details about UBSAN in the GCC. [1] - https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0/gcc/Debugging-Options.html [2] - https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html [3] - http://developerblog.redhat.com/2014/10/16/gcc-undefined-behavior-sanitizer-ubsan/ Issues which UBSAN has found thus far are: Found bugs: * out-of-bounds access - 97840cb6 ("netfilter: nfnetlink: fix insufficient validation in nfnetlink_bind") undefined shifts: * d48458d4 ("jbd2: use a better hash function for the revoke table") * 10632008 ("clockevents: Prevent shift out of bounds") * 'x << -1' shift in ext4 - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<5444EF21.8020501@samsung.com> * undefined rol32(0) - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1449198241-20654-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> * undefined dirty_ratelimit calculation - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<566594E2.3050306@odin.com> * undefined roundown_pow_of_two(0) - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1449156616-11474-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> * [WONTFIX] undefined shift in __bpf_prog_run - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<CACT4Y+ZxoR3UjLgcNdUm4fECLMx2VdtfrENMtRRCdgHB2n0bJA@mail.gmail.com> WONTFIX here because it should be fixed in bpf program, not in kernel. signed overflows: * 32a8df4e ("sched: Fix odd values in effective_load() calculations") * mul overflow in ntp - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1449175608-1146-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> * incorrect conversion into rtc_time in rtc_time64_to_tm() - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1449187944-11730-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> * unvalidated timespec in io_getevents() - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<CACT4Y+bBxVYLQ6LtOKrKtnLthqLHcw-BMp3aqP3mjdAvr9FULQ@mail.gmail.com> * [NOTABUG] signed overflow in ktime_add_safe() - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<CACT4Y+aJ4muRnWxsUe1CMnA6P8nooO33kwG-c8YZg=0Xc8rJqw@mail.gmail.com > [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix unused local warning] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix __int128 build woes] Signed-off-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Yury Gribov <y.gribov@samsung.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-